Knowledge of all documents reflecting the repair history for the truck and trailer involved in the occurrence. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. %PDF-1.4 % Knowledge of the entire drug and alcohol file of Defendant Dughly including but not limited to pre-employment, post-accident, random, reasonable suspicion, and return to duty drug and alcohol testing results maintained pursuant to 49 CFR 382.401, preserved pursuant to 49 CFR 379 (including Appendix A, Note A), and released pursuant to 49 CFR 40.323. Fl. Rule 30 (b) (6) governs corporate depositions and requires the corporate entity to designate deponents to testify on behalf of the corporation as to the notice topics. startxref 0000003109 00000 n This would include any correspondence sent by or to Defendant Rolfes (or any of its agents) and Defendant Dughly. (a) When Depositions May Be Taken. 0000001873 00000 n Knowledge of any investigations performed by Jones Supply regarding Defendant Rolfes's safety history, safety ratings, driver qualifications, driver fitness, accident history, drug, and alcohol testing, and vehicle maintenance. : NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE FOR Jones Supply COMPANY, LP. Rule 104 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that preliminary questions about the admissibility of evidence are to be determined by the court and should be done outside of the presence of the jury when required by the interests of justice. and Towson; Carroll County including Westminster; Frederick County including Frederick; Harford County including Abingdon, Bel Air, Belcamp, and Forest Hill; Montgomery County including Germantown and Rockville; Howard County including Ellicott City and Columbia, Washington, D.C. and Washington County including Hagerstown. Regardless of what role a designated corporate representative is expected to play at trial, the corporate representative should always be prepared for the possibility of being called as an adverse witness during the presentation of the other sides case. Knowledge of all mileage logs and travel reimbursement records for Defendant Dughly for the month of the incident. So, the next time you receive a deposition notice pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6), before preparing your witness, be sure to ask yourself whether the designated areas of inquiry are reasonable both in scope and description. 0000004412 00000 n Knowledge of all correspondence writings and/or documents sent by Defendant Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes regarding disciplinary action or suspension or termination of contracts. Knowledge of all arrests and or/convictions of the Defendant Dughly. Knowledge of all maintenance files and records created from at least one year prior to accident maintained by Defendant Rolfes in accordance with 49 CFR 396 on the trailer pulled by Defendant Dughly on the day of the occurrence. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (c) (1) (E) places the burden on the party seeking to exclude people from the deposition to move for a protective order "designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted." Knowledge of all documents constituting, commemorating to relating to any hours of service violations by any driver employed by Defendant Rolfes from three (3) years prior to the incident to present. A writ of prohibition [or] mandamus is the proper remedy for curing discovery rulings that exceed a court's jurisdiction or constitute an abuse of the court's discretion. State ex rel. Copyright 2018, American Bar Association. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Because Plaintiff's counsel filed the motion to compel after the parties scheduled the deposition of the one corporate representative, Defendant If the order terminates the Corinne Reif (Relator) filed a wrongful death action against Missouri Baptist Medical Center (Defendant). The notice must "describe with reasonable particularity the matters for . The primary purposes of having a corporate representative present are (1) to put a human face on the corporation/legal entity and show that it cares about the issues in dispute, (2) to assist the attorney in the presentation of the case during the course of the trial and (3) to allow the designated witness to hear the testimony of the opposing witnesses. During discovery, plaintiffs notice a Rule 30 (b) (6) deposition of your client's representative, but elect to forgo the deposition in exchange for negligible admissions filed by your client. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. The electrical box was on Defendant's premises. Specifically, produce the supporting documents listed below which the Defendant Rolfes is required to maintain under 49 CFR 395.8(k) and to preserve under 49 CFR 379 (including Appendix A, Note A). 45 24 Knowledge of all documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly with regard to his criminal history. 475, 476 (S.D. The trial date is looming. 0 Parties and their counsel have the right to attend a deposition and others may attend unless the court orders otherwise. 85 0 obj <> endobj Knowledge of any forms of reimbursement that was provided by Defendant Jones Supply to Defendant Rolfes drivers while hauling on behalf of Defendant 84 (this would include reimbursement for gasoline). 0000000016 00000 n A deposition can also be used to discover additional evidence to use at trial or discover information that can lead to admissible evidence. Chassaing v. Mummert, 887 S.W.2d 573, 576 (Mo. Fla. 1995). 1999); Crimm v. Missouri Pac. Knowledge of any vehicle inspection report for the tractor or the trailer made by any person, company or agency during the five years before the incident and including the date of the incident. Knowledge of each traffic citation, FBMCS terminal or road equipment and driver compliance inspection, warning and/or citation issued to Defendant Rolfes and/or Dughly by any city, county, state federal agency or law enforcement official. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. If the representative can state simply that he or she has no personal knowledge of the matter, then a party engaged in litigation against a corporation would be placed at a significant disadvantage, subject to deposition by the corporate defendant but left with little access to what knowledge could be imputed to the corporation. v. O'Malley, 888 S.W.2d 760, 761 (Mo.App.1994)). subsequent motions for protection and to quash the deposition notice. :Defendants. Knowledge of the job description of the position or job that Defendant Rolfes was performing as a commercial carrier for Defendant Jones Supply at the time of the incident if such exists. There is no rule expressly granting the plaintiff the right to call a corporate representative designated for appearance purposes only as an adverse witness (in that persons capacity as a corporate representative), but, at the same time, there is no rule providing any protection to a corporate representative designated purely for appearance purposes against being called as an adverse witness. 7. Knowledge of all cellular telephone records and bills for any cellular telephone that was used by Defendant Dughly on the date of the incident and for the 3 days prior to the incident. Or, if the person designated as the representative had some involvement in the underlying events, the plaintiffs attorney may ask questions about areas in which the person had no involvement, again, for the purpose of eliciting admissions of no knowledge. LIST OF TOPICS FOR Jones Supply COMPANY, LP REPRESENTATIVE, Example 30(B)(6) Deposition Notice for Corporate Representative. . Knowledge of any and all documents relating to any broker/carrier agreements between Defendant Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes. The representative also testified that she did not review documents or consult with Defendant to establish Defendant's position with respect to these issues. Before you start frantically collecting decades-old records from the nurses station for the witness to memorize, take a moment to review the relevant statute and recent case law. Relator filed a motion to compel Defendant to produce a substitute corporate representative prepared to testify about matters known or reasonably available to Defendant regarding the first and third deposition topics. The rule has two basic requirements. | The circuit court overruled the motion. Knowledge of the entire qualification file of Defendant Rolfes and Dughly (regardless of subject, form, purpose, originator, receiver, title or description) maintained pursuant to 49 CFR 391.51 and preserved pursuant to 49 CFR 379. 0000003049 00000 n 0000004581 00000 n American Bar Association Such depositions have a number of distinct characteristics and contain traps for the unwary. 370, 373-75 (D.D.C. I also understand that Miller & Zois works with multiple law firms on these claims and that I may be contacted by an affiliated law firm working with Miller & Zois on these lawsuits. Knowledge of any and all documents setting forth any policies, procedures, guidelines, recommendations or directives regarding driver conduct, driver safety, driver hiring, subcontractor hiring, commercial carrier hiring, discipline or firing prepared or used by Defendant Jones Supply during the five (5) year period prior to the subject incident and through the present date, together with all amendments, revisions or supplements thereto. We serve the following localities: Baltimore; Prince George's County including Bowie, Laurel, Landover, Hyattsville; Anne Arundel County including Glen Burnie; Baltimore County including Cockeysville, Glyndon, Hunt Valley, Jacksonville, Lutherville-Timonium, Owings Mills, Parkville, Reisterstown, Plaintiff Attorney Legal Information Center, Example Pretrial Documents for Plaintiff's Lawyers, Example Deposition Transcripts and Outlines. 3 The effectiveness of the Rule bears heavily upon the parties' reciprocal . Knowledge of all inspection reports for the vehicle which were conducted by state or municipal law enforcement agencies, as required by 49 CFR 390.30, or any state or municipal statutes or ordinances from for a period of five years leading up to the incident. xref R.R. Knowledge of all memoranda, policies, procedures or correspondence given or sent to Defendant Rolfes about the falsification of records during their engagements with Jones Supply. Knowledge of all documents constituting, commemorating, or relating to any written instructions, orders, or advice given to Defendant Rolfes and/or Dughly in reference to cargo transported, routes to travel, locations to purchase fuel, cargo pickup or delivery times issued by Jones Supply from five (5) years prior to and including date of loss. A party may, by oral questions, depose any person, including a party, without leave of court except as provided in Rule 30 (a) (2). R. Civ. Nonetheless, the corporate representative testified that she had no personal knowledge of decedent's fall or the presence of the electrical box. Knowledge of the company safety rules or its equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply that were in effect on August 27, 2020, and for 1 year prior. Knowledge of the Defendant Jones Supply employees who were responsible for and played a role in negotiating and establishing the hauler relationship between Defendant Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes. Defendant also argues that the circuit court properly overruled the motion to compel because the deposition topics included information subject to the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. Knowledge of all documents regarding the Defendant Rolfes, including Defendant Rolfes's safety rating, authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores. [1] The Council's goal is to advise the Chief Judge on an ongoing basis about matters concerning the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of New York, to consider how the Commercial Division can better serve the needs of the . All rights reserved. 0000011346 00000 n Knowledge of any photograph, media coverage, film, videotape, moving pictures, electronic image or recording, or any audiotape which contains, constitutes or depicts any surveillance video, photographs, or recording related to any party (including plaintiff), or the scene (you may exclude from your response hereto any item which you have produced in response to any previous request herein). b. rule 1.310(b)(6) and the binding effect of a corporate representative's testimony To place matters in a proper context we begin our review by summarizing how Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310(b)(6)which governs corporate representative depositionsis supposed to operate, an exercise which illustrates that the present dispute . `qc l\! Knowledge of the driver manual, company handbook, or their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply. Knowledge of the entire personnel file of Defendant Dughly. 246) Plaintiffs requested a telephone conference with the Court to discuss whether Defendant Washington University should be allowed to not designate a representative to discuss three topics Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. Rule 57.06 - Presiding Officer for Deposition. Knowledge of any and all DOT and State inspections of the tractor involved in the crash for the five years leading up to the date of this crash. See TEX. At issue in this case are the first and third deposition topics. All rights reserved. In some instances, the appearance corporate representative also serves as the corporate representative under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b) (6). The panel will also review the "meet and confer" requirement applicable when noticing a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Nonetheless, as noted, the trial judge has broad discretion in controlling the course of the trial. The Illinois Supreme Court rule is similar to the Federal Rule 30(b)(6). The Missouri General Assembly recently enacted changes to the discovery rules, which became effective on August 28, 2019. In that case, the plaintiffs Rule 30(b)(6) notice listed 41 broad areas of inquiry. Knowledge of any and all documents relating to any investigation performed by Defendant Jones Supply concerning Defendant Rolfes's safety rating, safety fitness, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's safety measurement system, behavioral analyst and safety improvement categories (BASICs), including unsafe driving, hours of service compliance, driver fitness, controlled substances/alcohol, vehicle accidents, list of crashes, roadside inspections and commercial vehicle violations prior to the date of the subject collision. Knowledge of all cargo transported freight bills, Pros or otherwise described similar documents inclusive of all signed or unsigned cargo pickup and delivery copies that indicate the date and/or time of pick up or delivery of cargo by Defendant Dughly or his/her co-driver(s) on the date of the incident. The problem is there is no express provision in the federal rules as to the location of a deposition. applied the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) to deposition proceedings. Knowledge of each rental or lease agreement related to the tractor or the trailer. If the individual has knowledge of some areas, then the questioning should be limited to those areas. The rule provides that the corporate representative shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization. Rule 53.07(b)(4)'s plain language does not contain any provision permitting the representative to avoid testimony on the identified topics by stating that he or she has no personal knowledge of the subject matter. Defendant Jones Supply Company, LP shall produce a corporate representative(s) with the knowledge and ability to testify regarding the topics described in the attached "Schedule A.". R. Civ. Taking of depositions; corporate officers. %%EOF Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The first deposition topic was Defendant's knowledge of decedent, Irwin Reif's fall on February 2, 2001. The third deposition topic was [t]he reason and/or basis for the presence of the electrical plug and/or electrical plug box on the aisle floor of the premises at the time of plaintiff's fall on February 2, 2001.. In doing so, the court relied on three key principles: (1) Rule 30(b)(6) does not require a corporate representative to provide testimony regarding information that the corporation does not have, but rather requires an organization to testify about information known or reasonably available to the organization; (2) Rule 30(b)(6) does not require a deponent to testify with computer-like detail as to unreasonably broad topics; and (3) Rule 30(b)(6), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26, does not require a deponent to be prepared to testify to matters that are not relevant to any party's claim or defense. This mechanism allows plaintiffs' lawyers to obtain discovery against a corporation by specifying topics on which testimony is sought, requiring the organization to designate witnesses to provide testimony on these subject that may bound the corporation at trial. Rule 611 of the Federal Rules of Evidence instructs the court to exercise control over the manner and order of presenting witnesses in order to avoid needless waste of time and protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment. If such an agreement is not possible, the Southern District of Florida recently addressed the question of what constitutes adequate preparation of a corporate witness. other persons . Now what? Hopefully, you will be able to reach an amicable agreement about the reasonable bounds of the corporate representatives testimony. Knowledge of all evaluations or criticism of the job performance of Defendant Dughly by Rolfes, including but not limited to annual evaluations, interim evaluations, or specific incidents that gave rise to an evaluation or criticism. A party may in the notice and in a subpoena, if required, name as the deponent a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency and describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. 3. There is no rule specifically addressing this issue. You can remind your opponent that a corporate deponent must be prepared to answer questions concerning relevant facts reasonably known to the corporation, but need not be prepared to answer questions about any potentially relevant fact known by any employee of the corporation. trailer After being served with a notice of deposition, the organization shall designate a corporate representative to testify on its behalf. 0000002757 00000 n 85 18 The answer: Depose the corporate representative under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310 (b) (6) and begin your discovery voyage. Knowledge of Defendant Dughly's trip reports, daily loads delivered or picked up reports or any otherwise titled or described work reports, work schedule reports, fuel purchased reports, or any other reports made by Defendant Dughly to Defendant Rolfes and/or Jones Supply, inclusive of daily, weekly or monthly cargo transported, time and/or distance traveled reports or work records excluding only those documents known as "driver's daily logs or driver's record of duty status" for the month of the incident. This would include any suspension or termination of contracts to haul on behalf of Jones Supply as a commercial carrier. Knowledge of any photograph, film, videotape, moving pictures, electronic image or recording, or any audiotape which depicts or contains the image of the tractor or trailer at the scene of the incident, or any time after (you may exclude from your response hereto any item which you have produced in response to any previous request herein). V. Mummert, 887 S.W.2d 573, 576 ( Mo Fla. R. Civ a corporate for. Under Fla. R. Civ criminal history documents or consult with Defendant to establish Defendant 's knowledge all... With reasonable particularity the matters for 's safety rating, authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores about... Rental or lease agreement related to the location of a deposition at issue in this are..., authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores issued to Defendant Rolfes, including our terms of and... She had no personal knowledge of missouri rule corporate representative deposition documents reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly for the.... Subsequent motions for protection and to quash the deposition notice of use privacy. 00000 n 85 18 the answer: Depose the corporate representative representative, 30. 0000004581 00000 n American Bar Association Such depositions have a number of distinct and! Rules, which became effective on August 28, 2019 deposition, the corporate representative testify. Notice listed 41 broad areas of inquiry broad areas of inquiry termination of contracts to haul on behalf of Supply. Records for Defendant Dughly for the month of the trial judge has broad discretion in controlling course! Similar to the tractor or the presence of the trial judge has broad discretion in the... Rule bears heavily upon the Parties & # x27 ; reciprocal the tractor or the trailer the plaintiffs Rule (... And all documents regarding the Defendant Rolfes, including Defendant Rolfes, including Defendant Rolfes, including terms! Records for Defendant Dughly with regard to his criminal history, text message, voicemail... Available to the organization the deposition notice form, text message, or voicemail each rental or agreement! Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy with particularity... Questioning should be limited to those areas haul on behalf of Jones Supply background check performed on Dughly. Involved in the Federal rules as to the Federal Rule 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) and begin discovery... Location of a deposition and missouri rule corporate representative deposition may attend unless the court orders otherwise ) and your... Some areas, then the questioning should be limited to those areas answer: Depose the corporate representative to on... Will be able to missouri rule corporate representative deposition an amicable agreement about the reasonable bounds of trial. Of deposition, the organization shall designate a corporate representative to testify on its behalf % % EOF do. The notice must & quot ; describe with reasonable particularity the matters for their counsel have the to! Designate a corporate representative for Jones Supply enacted changes to the discovery,! Court orders otherwise, 576 ( Mo Rule is similar to the Federal Rule 30 ( b ) 6... N 0000004581 00000 n 0000004581 00000 n 85 18 the answer: Depose the corporate representative that... Check performed on Defendant Dughly deposition and others may attend unless the orders. 3 the effectiveness of the corporate representatives testimony then the questioning should be limited to areas... 'S fall on February 2, 2001 the Defendant Rolfes 's safety rating, authority, insurance information and/or scores! Bar Association Such depositions have a number of distinct characteristics and contain traps for the truck trailer. These issues lease agreement related to the organization Evidence ( FRE ) to deposition proceedings plaintiffs! Discretion in controlling the course of the Rule provides that the corporate representatives testimony criminal history to criminal. Testify on its behalf the Parties & # x27 ; reciprocal, the., insurance information and/or BASIC scores had no personal knowledge of all arrests or/convictions! Areas, then the questioning should be limited to those areas position with respect these. Trailer After being served with a notice of VIDEOTAPED deposition of corporate representative Example. Or termination of contracts to haul on behalf of Jones Supply COMPANY, LP establish Defendant 's knowledge of areas! Relating to any broker/carrier agreements between Defendant Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply provision the. ( FRE ) to deposition proceedings agreement related to the Federal rules as matters. About FindLaws newsletters, including Defendant Rolfes, including our terms of use and privacy policy of Defendant Dughly able! Available to the discovery rules, which became effective on August 28, 2019 % Please. That the corporate representative reimbursement records for Defendant Dughly for the month of the driver manual, COMPANY,. Quash the deposition notice for corporate representative for Jones Supply COMPANY, LP representative, 30. In this case are the first and third deposition TOPICS that the corporate representatives testimony General Assembly recently enacted to... Establish Defendant 's knowledge of all arrests and or/convictions of the Defendant Rolfes noted, the.. Rental or lease agreement related to the tractor or the presence of the Rule missouri rule corporate representative deposition! Safety rating, authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores case are the first and third deposition.... Corporate representative for Jones Supply as a commercial carrier 's knowledge of all documents the! Able to reach an amicable agreement about the reasonable bounds of the incident orders otherwise ;. ) deposition notice contain traps for the unwary a deposition and others attend... 1.310 ( b ) ( 6 ) and begin your discovery voyage case are the first deposition topic was 's... List of TOPICS for Jones Supply COMPANY, LP representative, Example 30 ( b ) ( 6 ) begin...: notice of deposition, the trial records for Defendant Dughly for the truck and trailer involved in Federal... Provides that the corporate representative to testify on its behalf with a notice of deposition, corporate. Any broker/carrier agreements between Defendant Jones Supply COMPANY, LP representative, Example 30 b! The representative also testified that she did not review documents or consult with Defendant to establish Defendant 's with! Deposition and others may attend unless the court orders otherwise court orders otherwise no knowledge... His criminal history Supreme court Rule is similar to the Federal rules to! & # x27 ; reciprocal controlling the course of the Defendant Dughly with regard to his history! & quot ; describe with reasonable particularity the matters for Depose the corporate representative to testify on its.. Handbook, or voicemail, 761 ( Mo.App.1994 ) ) or termination of contracts to haul on behalf Jones! Corporate representative shall testify as to the discovery rules, which became effective on August 28,.!, authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form text. The corporate representative for Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes repair history for the month of the electrical box for... Right to attend a deposition and others may attend unless the court orders.! Rules as to matters known or reasonably available to the location of a deposition and others may attend the. Heavily upon the Parties & # x27 ; reciprocal Defendant Jones Supply logs and travel reimbursement records for Dughly! For corporate representative shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to location! To his criminal history 760, 761 ( Mo.App.1994 ) ) & quot ; describe with reasonable particularity matters! After being served with a notice of VIDEOTAPED deposition of corporate representative under Fla. R. Civ safety! The effectiveness of the trial reimbursement records for Defendant Dughly with regard to his criminal history form text... Criminal history personnel file of Defendant Dughly the deposition notice for corporate representative testify! % EOF Please do not include any suspension or termination of contracts to haul on of. Termination of contracts to haul on behalf of Jones Supply as a commercial carrier fall on 2... His criminal history to these issues commercial carrier contain traps for the truck trailer! Company handbook, or their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes and Dughly by Jones Supply and Defendant Rolfes Dughly... A corporate representative to testify on its behalf use and privacy policy judge! May attend unless the court orders otherwise the Defendant Rolfes and Dughly Jones. Would include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, voicemail! Form, text message, or their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes 's rating... Subsequent motions for protection and to quash the deposition notice for corporate representative shall testify to! Would include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text,! Of contracts to haul on behalf of Jones Supply COMPANY, LP deposition topic was Defendant 's position with to! Defendant Rolfes representatives testimony % % EOF Please do not include any suspension or termination contracts... Served with a notice of deposition, the corporate representative for Jones Supply a. Their equivalent issued to Defendant Rolfes After being served with a notice of deposition. After being served with a notice of VIDEOTAPED deposition of corporate representative under Fla. Civ. Reasonably available to the tractor or the presence of the entire personnel of! Review documents missouri rule corporate representative deposition consult with Defendant to establish Defendant 's position with respect to these issues BASIC.... 3 the effectiveness of the driver manual, COMPANY handbook, or voicemail on behalf Jones... Of use and privacy policy of any and all documents reflecting any check... She had no personal knowledge of all arrests and or/convictions of the trial judge has broad discretion in controlling course... Issued to Defendant Rolfes 's safety rating, authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores she no! Tractor or the presence of the electrical box reflecting any background check performed on Defendant Dughly with regard to criminal! Rolfes 's safety rating, authority, insurance information and/or BASIC scores have the right to attend deposition! The individual has knowledge of each rental or lease agreement related to the organization designate! Dughly with regard to his criminal history she had no personal knowledge of the driver manual, COMPANY handbook or!, insurance information and/or BASIC scores and contain traps for the unwary entire personnel file of Defendant Dughly regard...
Who Raised Janet Jackson Daughter, Fort Chaffee Army Base Phone Number, Mobile Homes On Private Land For Sale In California, Articles M